Elephone P9000 Handset Review Report

Elephone P9000 Handset Review Report

  • Advantages
  • Google Android 6.0
    Awesome display
    Swift & wire-less charging


  • Drawbacks
  • Finger marks sensor isn’t really effective
    Camera software package requires work

Do You Know THE ELEPHONE P9000?

The P9000 is the most popular Android-OS-based smartphone from Chinese maker Elephone, which happens to be receiving a good level of popularity for its low-cost yet content handset tech.

It ships with a 5.5-” LG-crafted Liquid crystal display screen, a true Octa-core MediaTek chipset, 4GB of RAM, 32GB of inborn space for storage, easy charging, cord-less charging, NFC element, a Sony-developed 13-megapixel shooter and a finger print sensor on the back.

The Elephone additionally runs Google Android 6.0, the best and newest version of Google’s operating-system. Regardless of these kinds of fabulous technical specs, it costs you no more than $200.

ELEPHONE P9000 – Design and BUILD Quality

Elephone’s past hard work are already slightly disagreeing in relation to all round build quality and design.

The Elephone M2 looked and sensed like a high-end phone but offered middle-of-the-road performance, With the P9000, however, this company in conclusion tends to have hit the perfect balance amongst ability and style.
The P9000 uses the on-going tendency in the Android industry for metal-body mobile phones, featuring a steel frame that’s backed by a plastic panel.

Across the sides of the cellphone you will discover that a delicate chamfered effects, besides the average buttons plus inputs. On the right-hand side are placed the power switch and volume rocker, although on the opposite side there exists a control that may be tweaked to be a one-press shortcut to open up more or less any application program you would like. Easily, a long-touch of this key also sets the handset towards soundless setting, not completely dissimilar to the “mute” switch discovered on iPhone devices.

On top of the mobile handset there’s the ubiquitous 3.5millimeter earphone jack port, while on the base exists the reversible USB Type-C data & charging outlet – a future-proof function that even the fairly recently unveiled Samsung Galaxy S7 does not feature. Flanking this port are two grilles, 1 housing a loudspeaker, the other the in-call microphone.

Rotating the P9000 around brings out a plastic back panel, which shows a texture which takes some becoming accustomed to. It is a matte-effect surface, which at the start appears to be it must be very soft – but nonetheless , it isn’t; to identify it as very fine-grain sandpaper wouldn’t be a million miles from the truth. I actually quite like it since it increases grip, but it also picks up marks and scratches a little too easily.

Upon the back there’s the Sony-made 21-mega-pixel shooter – together with LED flash and laser auto-focus – and the finger marks reader.
Dual-SIM option is a mainstream of the Chinese cellular marketplace, and the P9000 presents support for a pair of micro-SIM cards.

Then again, in the event that you would rather increase the size of your available storage you may use one of the SIM slots for a sd card, pleasantly boosting the quantity of available space for snap shots, music or other data.

Finger print scanners come to be relatively normal on low cost Android OS mobile phones – the Elephone Vowney & Elephone M2 each had one – however it’s very clear that firms including Elephone might be attempting to use the tech as correctly as their greater opponents.

The reader on the P9000 normally takes a second or perhaps third tap to enroll your fingerprint then un-lock the cell phone, but at a minimum you can use it to wake up the mobile phone even when the display screen is off. You could utilize it to confirm payment process on the Google Play Store, thanks to the fact that the product has Android 6.0 installed; when Android Pay affects the UK, it’s possible to team it up with the NFC chip to get contact-less payments in retailers.


Elephone with pride states that the P9000 has a 5.5in. Full HD, LG LTPS LCD on the phone’s Apple-like plastic-type packaging, and it has justification to shout about it – this screen is certainly awesome, even by upper-tier requirements.

Colours are especially punchy, contrast is amazing and viewing angles are rock-solid. When the adaptive brightness configuration is empowered, details can get a little dark, yet , at mid-to-full illumination the display confidently sings. It is easy to see in straight sunshine, too.
The producer is additionally confident to highlight that the handset has astonishingly narrow bezels – 1.6mm, in truth – on the left and right sides of the screen, which ensure that it isn’t too broad, for even a phablet-category smartphone. It is always quite big in the hands, but it really feels easier to hold than a part of its huge-screen rivals. In fact, placed alongside the Galaxy S7 – which comes with a 5.1-in display – the P9000 is just a bit taller.

Much like past Elephone handsets, the P9000 comes along with touchscreen gesture commands that allow you to open up applications when the display screen is shut off.

For example ,, tracing a “C” pattern on the resting display screen will instantly start up the snapper. All these shortcuts are straightforward enough to memorise and have the potential to be extraordinarily practical – provided you don’t use any kind of screen-locking security. Doing this implies that even when you enter the gesture, you have got to unlock your smartphone to visit the mobile app, what sort of defeats the intent. Even so, it’s tidy still.

Rigid-flex Electronic Circuit Board Design Eliminates Wearable Medical System Complications

Rigid-flex Electronic Circuit Board Design Eliminates Wearable Medical System Complications


The vast majority of printed circuit boards in the world today are simply rigid plates for connecting circuitry. However, that’s changing rapidly; the requirement for flex electronic circuit boards (or flex circuits) is aggressively increasing largely thanks to the booming wearable product industry. Probably the most significant segment of that market is the medical industry where wearable products will be utilized to collect all varieties of biological records for examination and study, as well as individual health use. Actually wearables are offered to keep tabs on heart rhythm, blood pressure levels, glucose, ECG, muscle movement, and a lot more.

The wearable devices bring many troubles for PC board designers that rigid boards don’t. The following are some of such problems along with what designers can do to help remedy them.

3 Dimensional Design

While each PC board is certainly 3 dimensional, flex circuits allow the entire assembly to be bent and folded to adapt to the package that the merchandise uses up. The flexible circuitry is collapsed to ensure that the rigid PC boards easily fit into the product package, occupying minimum space.
There is a lot more to the design, so the added challenges, than simply connecting the rigid boards. Bends have to be properly designed so boards get in line where they are meant to mount, while not placing stress on the connection points. Up to recently, engineers actually used “paper doll” models to emulate the circuit board assembly. At this point, design tools are offered that offer 3D modelling of the rigid-flex assy, helping more rapidly design and a lot greater precision.

Little Items and Squeezed Circuitry

Obviously, wearable products are required to be tiny and inconspicuous. Previously, a healthcare “wearable” maybe a Holter pulse rate monitor integrated a fairly large exterior device with a neck strap or maybe belt mount. The recent wearables are small and attach straight to the sufferer without any or very few external cables. They collect many different data and are able to even process several analyses.

An highly discreet device affixing straight to the patient dictates flex circuitry and really compressed layouts. Moreover, the board shapes usually are spherical or even more unusual shapes, requiring clever placement and routing. For this sort of tiny and dense boards, a PC board tool that is designed for rigid-flex designs helps to make handling unusual shapes easier.

Stackup Design is vital

The stackup – the map of the electronic circuit board layers – is critical when you use rigid-flex techniques. Perfectly, your PCB design software has the ability to design your stackup including both the rigid and flex parts of the assembly. As said before, the layout of the folding area ought to be built to decrease the stresses on the traces and pads.
One of the primary challenges with rigid-flex designs is qualifying multiple producers. After the design is fully gone, all aspects of the design is required to be communicated to the board fabricator so it will be effectively produced. But, the best practice is to pick one or more makers at the start of the design and work together with them to assure your design satisfies their manufacturing needs as the design moves on. Taking part with manufacturers is made simple by employing standards. In cases like this, IPC-2223 is the vehicle for getting in touch with your fabricators.

As soon as the design is done, the data package has to be assembled to hand-off to be produced. Though Gerber remains employed for standard PCBs in some companies, in terms of the difficulties of rigid-flex, it is strongly advised by both PCB program vendors together with fabricators that a more intelligent data exchange format be utilized. The 2 most wellwell-known intelligent formats are ODG++ (version 7 or higner) as well as IPC-2581, as both versions precisely define layer standards.


Photive BTH3 Headsets Overview

Photive BTH3 Overview


Quality Of Sound

Both of the Photive BTH3 and BTX6 apply 40 mm drivers, though listening for only a few seconds can make it clear that they don’t work with the identical 40 mm drivers. The sonic signature of each and every pair of headphones is significantly different from one other, and is very much intended for several types of buyers.

In trying the BTH3 I listened to both a mobile phone (a Motorola Moto X) connected via Bluetooth, and to Hifi FLAC audio recordings and CDs via the 3.5 mm audio cable, linked to a home PC by using a Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 audio interface. Usually, I played music of all types of genres, and then a couple of podcasts and an audiobook.


The highs are crystal clear and crispy, pretty much to a fault. The highs aren’t excessively accentuated, but there’s a crispy sort of sizzle to the highs which isn’t usually noticeable, however , was obvious on some songs.


The mids are clean and crystal-clear, with no slightly boxy sound which is so present in single-driver headsets in this price bracket. You can find an observable mild boost around the 1 kHz range, which can be presumptively there to offer vocals a small boost. This is slight enough to not be annoying, and doesn’t detrimentally impact the sound.


In contrast to the Photive BTX6 headphones and their X-Bass branding, the bass isn’t mind-boggling or hugely emphasised in the BTH3. It is not missing or thin-sounding either – it’s simply not clearly boosted as with the BTX3. Bass response is slightly on the slow side, so a slight lack of tight focus can turn up in some kinds of music, with fast metal or punk as the notable instances here.

Soundstage was astoundingly excellent for closed-back headsets, regardless if using them by Bluetooth. I know Bluetooth sound has made great progress , even so, this still impressed me a lttle bit. In general, this is a well-balanced and pretty good sounding pair of earphones, and I indeed favored the sound of the BTH3 to the higher priced BTX6, even if I’m not sure that this viewpoint is going to be shared.

Build & Design

Perhaps you may imagine, with the Photive BTH3 to be the more cost-effective of these two, these earphones will not be as cheesy looks as the BTX6. Whether or not this is a poor thing is really for you to decide. They are most certainly not an unpleasant pair of earphones, and while they don’t have the bold shape along with a lot more style-focused design of the BTX6, they are furthermore not nearly as odd looking. These are also on the leaner side, different from the bulky BTX6.

This is a quite comfy pair of headsets. It may lack the slightly puffier ear cushions of its more pricey sister, but as these are lighter, too much cushioning is not really necessary. After about two hours of use, I absolutely could feel that I was putting on headphones – these don’t vanish the way in which more expensive earphones like Bose’s SoundTrues do – however they didn’t feel irritating or significantly uncomfortable, even after that long. Probably because that they aren’t foldable, the BTH3 are more adaptable than the BTX6 headsets. The ear cups rotate lots, and along with the adaptable headpiece, it’s really simple to find a good fit with these headsets.

You should never stress about carrying these around with you either. Despite the fact that they aren’t foldable, they go with a hardshell case that isn’t such larger than the headphones themselves, that being said you can be able to quickly maintain them guarded. This really is nice to see, as we’ve discovered way more costly headsets offer only a soft case, or no case in any way.

Connectivity Choices

Pairing the Photive BTH3 headsets with the gadget of your liking is a fairly straightforward process. Although these do not feature the voice directions and cues that the BTX6 do, the flashing light on the side of the left ear cup is sufficient of a cue to make it easy to figure out that they automatically initiate broadcasting as soon as you turn them on. Strangely enough, this pair of earphones has a standalone power control key and standalone play/pause press button, unlike the multi-function press button applied to a large amount of headsets

While we’re talking about buttons, the BTH3 earphones are jamjam-choked with them. The left ear-cup holds the above play/pause button and furthermore the forward / skip and rewind / back buttons. The right earear-cup holds the power key and in addition dedicated volume level buttons. Again, many people might hesitate at the sheer number of control buttons here, but I think it is rejuvenating to have some much control easily available. In comparison to some headphones, all the control keys worked faultlessly with my Moto X during testing.